Skip to content

About EuroETF Hub

We are a small research desk that compares UCITS ETFs and European brokers, funded by affiliate commission and nothing else.

Last updated

Why we built this

Every one of us started out trying to answer the same question — which fund do I actually buy, from here, with this passport, and this tax residence — and found the internet full of answers written for someone in another country. US blogs recommend funds a European broker will not sell you. Fund factsheets assume you already speak the language. Broker pricing pages hide the fee that matters on page four.

EuroETF Hub exists to close that gap. We are investors first: everyone who writes here holds index funds, and several of us hold the exact funds covered on this site. That is a conflict worth declaring, so we declare it on every page where it applies.

What we stand for

European investors, only

Most fund research online is written for Americans. We cover UCITS funds you can actually buy from an EU or UK broker, priced in your currency, taxed under your rules.

Ratings before revenue

Rankings are produced from published criteria and finalised before any commercial conversation. No broker has ever been given a place, a score, or an edit in exchange for money.

We say when we don't know

Tax rules differ by country and change often. Where an answer depends on your residence, we say so and point you to the primary source instead of guessing.

How we evaluate a product

The same four steps, whether it is a fund or a broker. The full scoring detail lives in the rating methodology.

  1. 1

    Define what the product is for

    A fund for a 30-year buy-and-hold plan is judged differently from one used for a satellite position. We fix the use case before scoring anything.

  2. 2

    Collect the numbers from primary sources

    TER and structure come from the KID and factsheet. Broker fees come from the published price list. Where a vendor supplies tracking data, we name the vendor and the period.

  3. 3

    Score against fixed weights

    Each comparison publishes its weights — for brokers, total cost 40%, regulation and protection 25%, range 20%, usability 15%. The weights are set before the data is gathered.

  4. 4

    Review, date and revisit

    A second analyst checks the figures. Every page carries a last-reviewed date, and anything with fees or tax in it is re-checked on a fixed schedule.

How the site is funded

We earn a commission when a reader opens an account through some of the broker links on this site. We do not sell display advertising, we do not take payment for reviews, and we do not accept sponsored articles.

The full arrangement, including which brokers pay us and what happens when a broker we rate highly pays nothing, is set out in how we make money and the affiliate and legal disclaimer.

Who writes here

  • Marta König · Senior ETF Analyst
    • CFA Charterholder
    • MSc Finance, Bocconi
    • 9 years in fund research

    Marta covers index construction and fund costs, with a focus on how UCITS structures behave differently from their US equivalents. She previously spent six years in fund research at an asset manager in Frankfurt.

  • Sofia Lindqvist · Head of Research
    • CFA Charterholder
    • Former multi-asset portfolio manager
    • 14 years in markets

    Sofia signs off every rating and methodology change on the site. She spent a decade managing multi-asset portfolios before moving to independent research.

All authors